The 2016 Horizon Report for Higher Education was officially released during the annual meeting of the Educause Learning Institute (ELI), which wrapped up yesterday in San Antonio, TX. If you aren’t familiar with it, the annual Horizon Report for Higher Education, now in its 13th edition, is an ongoing collaborative research project between the New Media Consortium and ELI designed to “identify […]
Spring 2015 is positively lousy with EdTech-related events, meetings, webinars, and more events. And webinars. There are also meetings: lots of ‘em. Below are the ones I have compiled, at least through April, the cruelest month. For a complete list, go to http://edtech.vccs.edu/upcoming-events/.
If you have an event that you would like to add, please let me know.
February 06, 2015 (Happening now!)
JSRCC FantasTech Virtual Conference
February 09, 2015
Educause Learning Initiative (ELI)
February 11, 2015
Increasing College Access and Success through Zero-Textbook-Cost Degrees
February 17, 2015
New America Foundation: Community College Online
Washington, DC & online
February 19, 2015
ELET Committee Meeting
February 19, 2015
VCCS Peer Group Meeting | Accounting/Business/Economics
February 24, 2015
March 04, 2015
March 08, 2015
March 09, 2015
March 30, 2015
OpenSym 2015 | Call for Papers
March 30, 2015
OxCon: OpenStax Conference
April 01, 2015
New Horizons 2015
April 09, 2015
Council for the Study of Community Colleges Conference (CSCC)
Ft. Worth, TX
April 17, 2015
VWCC 2015 Instructional Technology Mini-Conference
April 22, 2015
OpenEd Global Conference
Banff, Alberta, CANADA
April 22, 2015
OLC | Emerging Technologies for Online Learning
Last monthÂ I completedÂ Educause’s Learning Technology LeadershipÂ (LTL) Â Program, held June 23-27 in Seattle, WA. I have been meaning to post my reflections andÂ have only now gotten around to having a spare moment to share them. The program was targeted at EdTech professionals like me who support and promote teaching and learning in some way or another within a higher education institution.Â The LTL program was essentiallyÂ aÂ leadership immersion experience, withÂ aÂ packed agenda and unwaveringÂ pace. Â The fifty or so participants and I were engaged throughout the day and often into the evening, from Monday afternoon and to a mini-graduation ceremony on Friday morning. It was a taxing schedule, especially those of us from the East Coast (and South Africa and Singapore) suffering from jet lag.
Overall I found the program to be meticulouslyÂ designed and well-organized, with plenty of hands-on activities and team-based work to keep me and the rest of the group engaged. The activities provided ample opportunity for me to get to know the other participants. Even so, with such a large group, I wasn’t ableÂ to meet everyone. Â As usual, I felt a bit like an outlier, both becauseÂ of my position andÂ level of leadership experience. While many of theÂ participants came from very large institutions, no one worked at a statewide or system level like me. Similarly, no one to my knowledge Â was involved in advancing higher education policy to the degree I have been during my three years at the VCCS. Â There was aÂ handfulÂ of individual community colleges representedÂ among the manyÂ public and private four year schools, which I found refreshing. Those are my peeps, you know.
There were two highlights to the program for me. The first was the completion of the Clifton Strengthsfinder assessment (you can find out more about the Strengthsfinder here). The assessment identifies your top fiveÂ strengths from a list of strengths that are organized into four categories: Â Executing, Influencing, Relationship, and Strategic Thinking. It wasn’t totally surprising Â to me that four of my top five strengths wereÂ in the Strategic Thinking domain. Having confirmation of this was not onlyÂ helpful to me in the LTL program but will continue to be useful to me in my work, which hopefully will bring aboutÂ lots of thinking and strategizing.
The second was aÂ team-basedÂ project that required us to to develop a plan to bring significant change to aÂ fictitious institution by applying the concepts of the five day program. The projectÂ culminated with a presentation from each groupÂ about their ideas, with the program faculty role-playing various higher education archetypes: the tightwad CFO, a self-interested college student, the even moreÂ self-interested faculty member, and a “don’t sweat the details”Â VP of academics. My team pitched repurposing the lecture classrooms of a small community college (Edgewater Community College, named after the conference hotel) into aÂ technology-richÂ active learning classroom, with modular furniture and configurable student workstations to support learner-centered, collaborative instruction.
Some RandomÂ Take-aways
- The field of educational technologyÂ still doesnâ€™t quite know what it is. This is reflected through the nomenclature used byÂ professionals working in this field: we areÂ IT, ET, EdTech, Instructional Designers, and Instructional Technologists. Some of us are considered administrators. Some of us are faculty. Some are staff. The field is amorphous and poorly defined.
- Despite this, unlike CIOs, “educationalÂ technologists” typically reside within aÂ organizational hierarchy that makes it difficult for them to lead effectively. As information technologists advance toward becoming CIOs, their expertise remains in InfoTech. But to advance one’s educationalÂ technology career means movingÂ Â awayÂ from teaching and learning technologies to areas like transfer, student services, and research.
- I think the promiseÂ of the LTL program and programs like it is toÂ helpÂ better define myÂ field as well asÂ create more opportunities for Â EdTech professionals to lead.
- You gotta walk the talk: leading is much easier ifÂ you also a teach.
- Academic freedom is actually a thing, as in a formal set of principles drafted by the American Association of University Professors in 1940. I had no inkling about this. I thought academic freedom was like the famous definition of pornography: “You know it when you see it.” Having a better understanding of AF will help me addressÂ conversations with concerned Â faculty in the future. I plan to write a separate post on this topic.
- Effective communication is a crucial aspect of successful leadership. But effective communication is no longer a simple matter of sending out a blanket email to all faculty and staff. TheÂ communications landscape is now extremely fragmented, andÂ this fragmentationÂ has added new layers of complexity to messaging, PR, and information sharing.
Have Â you participated in the LTL program before, or one like it? I’d be interested in any thoughts or reflections you had about the program’sÂ value to you, personally, professionally, or both.